top of page

Writing Studies Website

of the University of Washington Tacoma (UWT)

This is a group project in my Design Studio class, assigned by the Writing Studies faculty, where we completely redesigned the website using the existing content as a foundation.

My role: Co-led interaction and visual design. Involved in conducting user research, and usability studies.

The team: 2 interaction designers, 1 writer, 1 asset collector, 1 project manager. All involved in user research, testing, and writing.

Tool: Figma, Canva, Slack

Screenshot 2023-11-03 at 3.17.11 PM.png

Writing Studies is one of the majors in the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences of UWT. 

​

Problem: Through user research, we discovered the website is outdated, text-heavy, and couldn't deliver the value of the humanities majors to potential students. It causes the recruitment rate to drop and causes frustration in current major students when using the site. 

​

Solution: Redesign the website to provide engaging, informative but digestible content, and create a welcoming and inclusive feeling to enhance students interested in enrolling in the Writing Studies major, so they feel a sense of belonging and have access to information about the major and know what to do with it.

Process:  we conducted user research to understand who are we designing for. 

Target users:

  • Current Writing Studies students

  • Students in the Technical Communication minor

  • Non-WS major/Pre-major students

  • WS faculty

  • WS alumni

Research Methods:

  • Stakeholder interview

  • User Interviews

  • Contextual Interviews

  • Survey

  • Competitive Analysis

We found 5 key insights based on everything we gathered :

  1. What can you do with a WS degree?: Students want to know what to do with their Writing Studies degree.

  2. Finding Connections: Students want to find opportunities to connect outside of the classroom.

  3. Involvement in WS: Faculty want to show what is happening within the Writing Studies major.

  4. Visual Engagement: Students want more appealing content and visual features.

  5. Organization, Structure, & Labels: Information architecture is confusing and could lead students to take the wrong classes. 

 With our findings from research, we came up with a UX goal under a How Might We statement question:

​

"How might we engage students interested in or enrolled in the Writing Studies major so they feel a sense of belonging and have access to information about the major and know what to do with it?"

IMG_5859.jpeg
IMG_5862.jpeg
IMG_5857.jpeg

Having a clear statement helped us come up with the user storyboard, and based on that, we were able to map out the site's navigation bar and potential pages/ content for each category.

IMG_6112.jpeg

Prototype 

​

After receiving feedback and suggestions from the usability study's participants and stakeholders. We went through 2 iterations to improve the navigation flow to make it smoother, revised text and added more labels for better communication, focused more on the information architecture, and balanced the amount of visuals and text on the pages. Below are some of the pages in our prototype that went through major adjustments.

Before

Home page 1st ver

Screenshot 2023-11-03 at 6.04.01 PM.png

After

Home page 2nd ver

Screenshot 2023-11-03 at 6.05.36 PM.png

Before

Track 1st ver

Screen-Shot-2023-03-14-at-8.15.59-PM-768x2050.png

After

Track 2nd ver

Screen-Shot-2023-03-14-at-8.21.54-PM-1152x2048.png

Before

Apply 1st ver

Screen-Shot-2023-04-29-at-10.02.04-PM-868x2048.png

After

Apply 2nd ver

Screen-Shot-2023-03-14-at-8.40.21-PM-1552x2048.png

Before

Apply 1st ver

Screen-Shot-2023-04-29-at-9.44.04-PM-866x2048.png

After

Apply 2nd ver

Screen-Shot-2023-03-14-at-8.28.34-PM-764x2048.png

Before

Alumni 1st ver

Screen-Shot-2023-04-29-at-10.07.16-PM-929x2048.png

After

Alumni 2nd ver

Screen-Shot-2023-04-29-at-4.57.17-PM-1-844x2048.png

Result 

​

We successfully delivered the final prototype to our stakeholders. They and other students were impressed with the design and expressed excitement about the potential of the product. While we feel proud of the work we’ve done, we also recognize that there is always room for improvement. While our team won’t be responsible for the product’s continued iteration, we’re confident that future teams will be able to build upon our progress and deliver a successful implementation. Ultimately, we believe that a commitment to ongoing improvement will help the product reach its full potential and achieve its intended goals.

​

Update: I'm proud to say that the current Writing Studies website was revised based on our prototype. 

Memories
This was us - the professor, my team, and I - after delivering the prototype to the Stakeholders. 
IMG_6694 2_edited.png
Our project was nominated by the Institue for Innovation and Global Engagement (IIGE) Research Paper & Project Award.
unnamed-2.jpg
bottom of page